Title : 1329-1332: IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve from Lincoln County Watch
link : 1329-1332: IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve from Lincoln County Watch
1329-1332: IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve from Lincoln County Watch
Tuesday, October 30, 2018
1329-1332: IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Most people will be alarmed to hear rumors of an IMF take over of the Federal Reserve.
The IMF organized and promoted by the Rockefeller interests and Oil Barons has been functioning as the "U.S. Treasury" since shortly after the Second World War. They have used the IMF for no end of
market manipulations and political intrigues and false claims in commerce.
market manipulations and political intrigues and false claims in commerce.
That said, the Federal Reserve fronted by the Warburgs and Rothschilds is even older and worse in its own sluggish nasty way.
So you have the spectacle of the snakes eating each other, and quarreling over which tail is which.
The important take home point is that despite the pandering and plumage, they are all snakes, they are all criminals, and a choice between raspberry feces and vanilla feces is still an insane non-choice scenario for the rest of us.
Asked by a friend this afternoon to name a bank with "clean hands" I couldn't name one major international bank that is less than pitch black filthy. None.
Asked what I would do, I said --- take them over, establish new management, establish new regulatory agencies, and stand with both feet on their necks until the end of time.
Until we all grow up and get rid of the entire concept of money and "representations of value" and adopt a sane worldwide currency based on all commodities, all natural resources, and all labor assets, keeping both feet on the banker's necks is the only answer.
The moment you let up on one of them, he sets out to free all the rest of them from competent regulation. They are like gang members. They have the Big "B" tattoo on their chests.
A bunch of silly Nellies are running around predicting chaos and meltdowns and rioting in the streets if the Federal Reserve is taken down. I got news for them. They bankrupted the "Federal Reserve System" in 2009, so all that was protected by Mama Vatican and the Slime Balls in the United States Bar Association, instead of being returned to the lawful Priority Creditors ----us.
The time for rioting and giving a damn about the "Federal Reserve" was ten years ago or more. The time to liquidate the IMF and blast the Rockefeller Mobsters off their French thrones is right about now.
All those assets ---- all of them ---- belong to us. The "National Debt" belongs to us. The Bid Bonds and labor contracts --- ours, ours, ours. The indemnity bonds and guarantees and bottomry bonds and "Life Force Value Annuities" ---- all ours. The CUSIP bonds --- ours, again. All the Puerto Rican Foreign Grantor Trusts ---- ours, nobody else's. All the IRS collections, all the Internal Revenue Service collections, and all the property taxes and mortgages ---- all of it, is owed to us, minus a relatively small fee for services we actually contracted for and actually received under the stipulations of our Constitutions.
And these criminals, including the IMF, are trying to say that they are our Trustees and that they are collecting "for" us.
Have you heard enough of this chant and rant? We don't have any Trustees.
The Trustees who were supposed to be safeguarding our interests were worse than common thieves. So..... guess what?
We are standing here on our own flat little feet demanding the return of our rights, titles, and interests, our assets, our labor, our rents and leases, our fees, our property in sum total. Now.
No Karen Hudes, no Kim Goguen, no IMF, no middlemen "representing" us and administrating our estates "for" us. They are nothing but Executors de Son Tort --- a phrase that can only be answered for with Autrefois Convict.
Just dump it all into our bank and we will tend to our own business from now on.
We will sort through the horrible mess that all these very competent and important and highly educated people have made, and bring relief at last, with decency and common sense that has been completely lacking for decades.
Let the IMF be forewarned---- they aren't our Treasury and they aren't our Trustees and as much as we despise and care nothing for the Federal Reserve, in our view, the IMF is not a bit better.
We will nail them both to the wall for fraud and mis-representation with equal alacrity and we will demand their liquidation if they steal one peso from any American and that means all the Americans who have been mis-identified on purpose as British Territorial "Citizens", too.
Got that, Butch?
I can't think of a single international commercial bank that deserves to survive a liquidation challenge for criminal activity. Not one.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Urgent Message to Americans Age 80 and Over
By Anna Von Reitz
We need your help.
False claims are being made to the effect that we consented to being British subjects, that we willingly consigned all our assets and land and homes as chattel backing the debts of the British Crown Corporation and voluntarily adopted a Commonwealth as our form of government, that we gave up our constitutional guarantees, and that we agreed to be considered "citizens" of the British Territorial United States, purportedly in equitable exchange for welfare benefits that we financed and paid for ourselves.
In fact, we were never told about any of these false claims.
This Hogwash being promoted by the guilty parties needs to be rebutted and rebuked by the eye-witnesses who were alive at the time and who have first-hand knowledge of the facts and events.
We have abundant evidence that on March 6, 1933, at a private meeting of the Conference of Governors, the British Territorial Governors "pledged" the assets of "their states and the citizenry thereof" to pay off the debts of the "United States of America" Incorporated, a religious non-profit corporation fronted by the Roman Catholic Church as a Delaware Corporation in 1925 and bankrupted in 1933.
Of course, their "States of States" had nothing whatsoever to do with our States and their "citizenry" had nothing to do with our State Citizens.
Nonetheless, as a result of this "pledge" of foreign assets, Americans were deliberately mistaken-on-purpose as British Subjects, and kidnapped into the foreign jurisdiction of the British Territorial United States, there to be plundered and conscripted and divested of their rights, property assets, and other guarantees in Gross Breach of Trust.
We have abundant evidence that Franklin Delano Roosevelt lied through his teeth to the American People and never disclosed the meaning, intent, or result of his New Deal---- which was treason wrapped in a blanket, a self-serving and odious plot to further undermine our national sovereignty and rob us blind for the sake of foreign interests.
And now they want to claim that we all knew what was going on and willingly, voluntarily consented to all this abuse and damned lies and false claims and foreign Inquisitors occupying our courtrooms to collect debts we never owed.
There can be no words competent to describe the infamy of the British Territorial United States or the criminality of the Holy See for allowing any of these practices against The United States of America and the innocent American People.
According to their deeds, Rome, Westminster, and London should all be turned to sheets of glass, with Hong Kong and Washington, DC and Ontario, Canada, to follow.
We stood by these wretched bastards through two World Wars, and this is the thanks we get for it. They have attempted to genocide us on paper and leave us holding the bag for all their debts, all their war-mongering, all their sins.
So now is the time for pay back and an end to all this self-serving drivel that we "consented" to any of this abuse and theft.
We are calling upon those Americans who are 80 years of age and above to come forward and given testimony based on their living recollection of the events taking place in the 1930's and 40's. We are calling upon their sons and daughters to help them do the paperwork and get their testimony witnessed by a Public Notary and recorded at the local land recording offices. We are asking that you all send a certified copy to: The Living Law Firm, 1336 Staubbach Circle, Anchorage, Alaska 99508.
In doing this, you will also create a Public Record in defense of your own property and establish evidence to protect your whole family from these vermin and their lies.
We realize that this may be a bit difficult to organize, so we have created and attached a basic template that can be used all over the country. For those who have more specific information to bring forward and who feel competent to do so, please add and adjust. For convenience sake, we colored the specific information you need to change in the template red.
Please discuss the situation with your Elders and those who understand the situation, please encourage them to come forward and testify in behalf of all Americans. And get it on the record, so we can shove it down their throats.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Notice to All Wannabe Interlopers:
By Anna Von Reitz
There is no way in Hell that Keith Livingway bought "The United States of America" or any special right related to it at a Naval Auction or via any other action he has pretended to take. Our actual copyright to that name is held in sovereign jurisdiction and is not transferable or for sale to any commercial entity whatsoever. Livingway picked up on pieces of the Scottish interloper that infringed on our copyrights in 1868: The United States of America, Incorporated, not The United States of America [Unincorporated]. The Scottish corporation was bankrupted in 1907. The bankruptcy settled in 1953. The Navy was selling off whatever scrap was left. Keith totally misunderstood what he was buying and the provenance of it, and therefore misinterpreted the meaning of it.
Our actual government is a government of, for, and by the people ----- not a government of, for, and by the persons.
This is a fundamental understanding that must be accepted by everyone concerned. And the Maxim of Law that applies, as I noted yesterday, is: "Possession by pirates does not change ownership."
The Scottish corporation deceitfully calling itself "The United States of America" for purposes of pillaging and press-ganging, kidnapping our people into foreign conscription, and seizing false title to our assets, was a criminal operation intent on inland piracy. If the Navy had been worth beans, it would have intercepted and prosecuted this Pretender.
That it succeeded in its fraud is of no concern to us at this point, as there is no statute of limitation on the crime of fraud and there is no cessation of probate related to any estate.
We are here to collect our assets and we will prosecute any and all foreign corporations infringing upon our copyrights, titles, and interests or attempting to insinuate themselves as Successors to any constitutional contract by a process of assumption.
I hope that makes it all abundantly clear to everyone, including the supporters of the French corporation attempting to do business as "The Republic" and the Scottish doppleganger attempting to do business as "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".
We are all thoroughly sick of these deceits, this disservice, and this dishonor. We want no more Pretenders of any kind or stripe. Moreover, as of October 9, 2018, the Delegated Powers returned to us by Operation of Law, as I have explained elsewhere.
What this means is that there is no longer any "federal" government of the kind we have been dealing with. The only actual government left standing in international jurisdiction is our lawful Federation of States formed September 9, 1776.
Go figure.
There aren't going to be any new interlopers picking up "governmental services contracts" by assumption here.
And all the BS is at an end. All the Europeans can go home and read their tea leaves from now on, and horribly confused people like Keith Livingway can stand down.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Yes, He Can and No, He Can't
By Anna Von Reitz
There is a big flap this morning because President Trump is trying to end the "Anchor Baby" provisions that immigrants and the INS have been abusing, by ending birthright citizenship claims related to "U.S. Citizenship".
Many people have reacted in alarm and thought that this means that he has power to end their birthright claims of nationality and State Citizenship.
The real answer is: yes, he can, and no, he can't.
As President of a corporation, already empowered by over 350 "emergency powers" granted to his Office by the British Territorial United States Congress back in the 1930's and continued by their Successors, Donald J. Trump can do darn near anything in the wide world he wants to do with respect to the day to day operations of that corporation, its subsidiaries, its subcontractors, its employees, its policies, and its statutory "laws".
It was, after all, their policy to allow "Anchor Babies" to provide their families with instant access to our country in the first place, and many would argue an irresponsible policy, too. It is Mr. Trump's job as President to alter corporate policies as necessary to deal with emergencies. The "National Emergency" status as already been declared. He is already in position to move. God bless him. Being born on American soil makes the baby an American, but doesn't (necessarily) make him a "U.S. Citizen".
I have been trying to get exactly this point across for many months.
That said, as President of a foreign corporation, Donald J. Trump has no ability or authorization to tamper with any aspect of American nationality or American State Citizenship. As above, it is entirely possible for a baby born on the soil of California to be a Californian, but there is nothing that makes his Mother or Father a Californian, too. They have already been born on the soil of Honduras or Mexico or wherever else, which establishes their nationality and citizenship obligations, if any.
This idea that they could busload hundreds of women in late pregnancy to the border, offload them like cattle, and then simply wait for them to give birth on American soil and thereby get a free pass for everyone in the family all the way back to the grandparents to become "U.S. citizens" was always crackpot and a means to end run around the Public Law.
It is also a cruelly deceptive means to entrap these people who are seeking freedom in the corporate enslavement racket instead.
Mexicans and Hondurans are not worth as much as slaves in the international slave market, but when they cross our border they magically gain in value astronomically, simply by having the label "U.S. citizen" attached to them. This sets up a situation where both the corporations serving "as" governments can profit by their migration.
All the U.S. Government has to do is provide a cut of the resulting profit to the Honduran or Mexican or other "government" corporation, and they will be happy to send an unending supply of new "U.S. citizens" to our borders. This is profitable for both corporations, because the value of an average "U.S. citizen" is far and away above any welfare costs or benefits the people ever receive, and the "U.S." Inc. can borrow against the value of its "citizenry" in the world slave market, thus providing extra income for the vermin in DC.
That is the dirty reason for all the dirty Democrats supporting mass immigration.
It's also the reason for all the forced immigration of Muslims -- quite apart from the wars in the Middle East -- into Europe.
A German "citizen" is worth a lot more than a Yemen "citizen" and the guilty governments are profiting themselves without regard for the people they are supposed to serve.
I gave a citation yesterday regarding "U.S. citizenship" and got back a response that someone went online and couldn't find it.
First, be aware that if you want to read law you have to go to a Law Library and read the hard copy, and if you want to know what really happened you have to go into the case files. What appears online is often heavily redacted, simplified, and annotated in various ways. Second, it has been profitable to the knaves to hide key citations and they have done so, just as they have burned books and suppressed treaties throughout their history. Third, that's far, far from the only citation giving you the same facts (and more) about the issue of "citizenship".
Here's a few more to cut your teeth on, for all of you who aren't sure that there is a difference between being an American and being a "U.S. citizen":
“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own...” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,...” “One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States”. McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)
“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,...” Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)
"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..." Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
"On the other hand, there is a significant historical fact in all of this. Clearly, one of the purposes of the 13th and 14th Amendments and of the 1866 act and of section 1982 was to give the Negro citizenship. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1967), 379 F.2d 33, 43.
"The object of the 14th Amendment, as is well known, was to confer upon the colored race the right of citizenship. " United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 692.
“The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other”. Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)
“There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such”.
Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)
“The rights and privileges, and immunities which the fourteenth constitutional amendment and Rev. St. section 1979 [U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1262], for its enforcement, were designated to protect, are such as belonging to citizens of the United States as such, and not as citizens of a state”. Wadleigh v. Newhall 136 F. 941 (1905)
“...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship”. Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,...” “One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States”. McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)
“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,...” Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)
"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..." Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
"On the other hand, there is a significant historical fact in all of this. Clearly, one of the purposes of the 13th and 14th Amendments and of the 1866 act and of section 1982 was to give the Negro citizenship. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1967), 379 F.2d 33, 43.
"The object of the 14th Amendment, as is well known, was to confer upon the colored race the right of citizenship. " United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 692.
“The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other”. Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)
“There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such”.
Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)
“The rights and privileges, and immunities which the fourteenth constitutional amendment and Rev. St. section 1979 [U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1262], for its enforcement, were designated to protect, are such as belonging to citizens of the United States as such, and not as citizens of a state”. Wadleigh v. Newhall 136 F. 941 (1905)
“...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship”. Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
----And, always note, that the so-called "Revised Statutes" were never actually enrolled on the Federal Register, that is, never actually "Revised" except for internal corporate use, because those making the revisions never had the power or authority to make them apply generally.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Thus Article 1329-1332: IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve from Lincoln County Watch
That's an article 1329-1332: IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve from Lincoln County Watch This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article 1329-1332: IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve from Lincoln County Watch with the link address https://polennews.blogspot.com/2018/10/1329-1332-imf-take-over-of-federal.html
0 Response to "1329-1332: IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve from Lincoln County Watch"
Post a Comment